
Anti-corrosion fillers
Plastic-contact filling options for bleach, acids, alkalis, fertilisers and aggressive cleaning liquids where stainless wetted parts are not suitable.
Read moreMachinery range
Compare chemical filling equipment by liquid behaviour, filling principle, automation level and pack format, then turn your product problem into a clear enquiry brief.
Choose your equipment
Select the option that best matches your liquid and pack. Each option explains when it is useful and what details to provide for a proper quotation.

Plastic-contact filling options for bleach, acids, alkalis, fertilisers and aggressive cleaning liquids where stainless wetted parts are not suitable.
Read more
Filling machinery options for solvent, flammable or hazardous-area projects where the line must be considered alongside site zoning and product data.
Read more
Semi-automatic and automatic filling options for foamy detergents, sanitisers, trigger-spray liquids, gels and household chemicals.
Read more
Weight, pump or flow-controlled filling options for 5L, 10L, 20L, 25L and larger industrial containers where handling matters as much as speed.
Read more
Project-led specification for low-viscosity specialist liquids, vapour considerations, splash control, fill accuracy and safer line layout.
Read more
Screw caps, pumps, trigger sprays, ROPP closures, cap feeding and torque control specified around the filled chemical pack.
Read more
For pilot production, short runs, batch changeovers and growing manufacturers moving away from hand filling.
Read more
Inline multi-head systems for higher throughput, conveyor-fed containers, repeatable dosing and integrated fill-cap-label projects.
Read more
Filling, capping, labelling, coding, conveyors and accumulation planned as one working line rather than separate purchases.
Read moreSpecification
A fast machine is only useful when the filling method suits the product. Thin foaming detergents, heavy oils, aggressive bleach, adhesives and solvent products can all need different pumps, valves, nozzles and control logic.
Comparison
| Requirement | Why it matters | Possible equipment option |
|---|---|---|
| Corrosive product | Wetted material compatibility drives the machine design. | Anti-corrosion filler with suitable plastics, seals and tubing |
| Flammable solvent | Electrical and pneumatic specification may need hazardous-area review. | ATEX-aware specification |
| Foaming detergent | Nozzle control and fill profile affect splash, foam and presentation. | Diving nozzles, controlled flow and compatible pump option |
| Large containers | Operator handling, fill weight and ergonomics become critical. | Bucket, pail, jerrycan or drum filling equipment |
| Frequent SKU changes | Changeovers can dominate actual line performance. | Semi-auto, compact or modular automatic line |
Process
Identify viscosity, foaming, corrosiveness, particulates, temperature and material compatibility.
Check bottle stability, neck finish, cap family, label panel and outer packing method.
Compare batch size, operator time, containers per minute and planned growth.
Review conveyors, capping, labelling, coding, accumulation, guarding and installation needs.
FAQ
Start with product behaviour and container size. Corrosive liquids, flammable liquids, foamy detergents and viscous adhesives can need very different filling principles and contact materials.
Often yes, but the answer depends on viscosity range, compatibility, cleaning requirements, fill volume range and how frequently the line changes SKU.
Yes. Larger containers usually need weight, pump or flow-controlled options with careful attention to container handling and operator ergonomics.
Speak to Lancing
Send the product, fill volume, container, closure and target output. Include SDS and compatibility notes where relevant.
Technical selection
The dosing principle is only one part of the decision. A chemical filler also has to control the product path, start and stop cleanly, present the container safely, recover from faults and support the required cleaning and changeover method. The strongest specification separates verified requirements from assumptions and identifies the points that need a sample trial.
| Filling route | Where it may be considered | Critical qualification questions |
|---|---|---|
| Peristaltic | Small to medium doses where keeping liquid inside replaceable tubing offers a useful product-path or changeover benefit | Tubing chemistry, fatigue life, occlusion setting, flow stability, dose range and disposal or cleaning of the hose |
| Diaphragm pump | Free-flowing and some foamy liquids, including projects that benefit from a simple compatible fluid path | Diaphragm and valve materials, pulsation, suction conditions, pressure, air quality, cut-off and drainage |
| Piston or positive-displacement | Repeatable volumetric dosing for compatible liquids and more viscous products | Cylinder and seal compatibility, particle content, viscosity range, product temperature, cleaning access and anti-drip design |
| Gear or lobe pump | Oils, viscous liquids and applications requiring controlled positive displacement | Shear, dry-running risk, clearances, seal materials, solids, pressure, cleaning and whether product can remain in the pump |
| Weigh filling | Large containers or products where net weight is the preferred control variable | Tare handling, platform capacity, vibration, product feed control, two-stage fill, calibration method and container removal |
| Flow measurement | Automatic lines where a compatible meter can measure the product reliably | Conductivity or meter principle, density/temperature effects, entrained air, minimum flow, cleaning and calibration traceability |
Published Lancing platforms
Lancing publishes example platforms that illustrate different machine routes. The final configuration may change with product chemistry, dose, container, utilities, guarding and required output. Performance figures should therefore be repeated with the agreed product and packs during a controlled trial or factory acceptance test.
| Reference platform | Published route | Project use |
|---|---|---|
| LUYTCR2 | Two-head, fully pneumatic, plastic-contact semi-automatic filler; published 200–1000 ml reference range | Starting point for compatible corrosive household and industrial liquids; formulation approval remains essential |
| LUSVPP80C | Four-channel servo peristaltic automatic filler; published approximately 10–500 ml recommended range | Small-container automatic filling where hose-contact dosing and rapid product-path changeover may be valuable |
| LUGTW2S platform | Twin-head weigh filler with diving nozzles; published 5–30 litre reference range | Large-container projects where weight control, foaming and controlled pack handling are important |
| LUYTEXW1 platform | Compact weigh-filling route for 10–30 litre flammable-liquid applications | Reference only for projects with a competent hazardous-area brief and project-specific conformity requirements |
From trial to acceptance
A useful trial includes the lowest and highest fill, the least stable container, normal product temperature, start-up after a pause, nozzle shut-off, a planned changeover and the cleaning or flush method. Record actual values rather than relying on a headline speed. For automatic equipment, include infeed variation, downstream stops, no-container/no-fill behaviour and recovery after a controlled fault.
Issue one controlled application brief covering product, packs, output, site and acceptance boundaries.
Review wetted parts, seals, hoses, pumps and cleaning fluids with the relevant material and component suppliers.
Use representative product, containers and closures to expose foam, drips, splash, aeration and handling risk.
Measure the agreed fill and good-output criteria, record deviations and close actions before dispatch and handover.
Engineering FAQ
No. Suitability depends on the complete formulation, concentration, temperature, contaminants, cleaning chemicals, exposure time and fabrication details. Obtain a project-specific compatibility review rather than approving a machine by material name alone.
Sometimes one platform can cover a useful range, but nozzle reach, metering range, container support, change parts, line speed and accuracy at the extremes must be demonstrated. A very broad range can make changeover or performance less efficient.
Define the measure, sample size, target fill, product condition, container or tare method and whether the result is individual-pack, average or process-capability based. A percentage without test conditions is not a complete acceptance criterion.
Trials are particularly useful when chemistry, foam, viscosity, stringing, aeration, container stability or cut-off behaviour is uncertain. Use production-representative materials and agree what will be measured before the trial.
Yes for a complete line. Fill level, residue around the neck, container squeeze, closure presentation and conveyor spacing can affect capping and labelling. Treat the finished pack as the acceptance output.
Machine shortlist
Send the SDS where relevant, product and pack samples, fill range, target good output, cleaning requirement and site constraints.